Office of Student Community Standards
129 David L. Eisler Center
805 Campus Drive
Big Rapids, MI 49307
(231) 591-3619
[email protected]
The Ferris State University Care Team is a multi-disciplinary team of employees from across the campus that meet weekly throughout the fall and spring semesters to review referrals of student behavior that raise significant concern. These concerns typically go beyond what can typically be addressed through traditional classroom and employee management. The goal of the team is to coordinate outreach or intervention to these students.
The team is dedicated to fostering an educational environment for all members of our community through a proactive, objective, supportive, and collaborative approach. The Care Team is dedicated to the prevention, identification, assessment, intervention, management, and coordinated response to student situations that cause concern including those that may pose a wellbeing and/or safety of individuals in our campus community.
Student Behavior of Concern Reporting Form
This Team focuses on student behaviors. Team members are listed below by title. Additional staff and faculty members such as the Director of Multicultural Student Services, the Directors’ of Student Academic Affairs, Faculty Member(s), the Provost and/or Deans, and the Athletic Director; and others, may be called upon to join to address specific incidents/student concerns.
Typically, employee concerns will be addressed by Human Resources, Labor Relations, and/or General Counsel.
The Care Team consists of university faculty and staff with expertise in student affairs, mental and physical health, student conduct, law enforcement/campus safety, etc. Team members are responsible for completing ongoing training, attending meetings, reviewing cases, providing input on threat assessment and possible interventions, assisting with follow-up and intervention based on their membership category. The Care Team has three levels of membership: core, inner circle and outer circle.
Core members attend every Care Team meeting (scheduled and emergency) and have full access to the team’s electronic record-keeping database. As core members, they represent their departments and have authority to make independent decisions within their areas of responsibility. If a core member is unable to attend a meeting, they have designated backups who attend in their place. The departments they represent are crucial to the Care Team’s ability to gather information, accurately assess risk, and intervene effectively. All core members are expected to respond to all emergency meeting requests and function as the threat assessment team.
Kavaris Sims (231-591-2684, [email protected])
The Associate Dean of Student Life chairs the team and attends all meetings. The Associate Dean organizes and shares the agenda, performs an initial rating using the NABITA Risk Rubric, ensures team members’ attendance, ensures that a risk level is assigned to each case during meetings, and coordinates the interventions/follow-up for cases. The Associate Dean also ensures appropriate and complete records are maintained in Maxient, the electronic recordkeeping database. The Dean of Student Life serves as back up.
Becca Brumels (231-591-3613, [email protected])
The Director of Student Community Standards attends the team meetings. The director consults on cases involving on- and off-campus conduct violations, criminal charges, and academic disruptions. Conduct records are protected under FERPA and shared with the CARE team by the director of student community standards under the legitimate educational interest clause of FERPA. The Assistant Director of Student Community Standards attends if the Director is unable.
Gary Green (231-591-5000, [email protected])
The Director of Public Safety attends each meeting. The director serves as a liaison with local and federal law enforcement agencies, consults on CARE team cases that have criminal or law enforcement elements, contributes to the assessment of risk for referrals, and assists with interventions on campus requiring a police presence. If the director is unable to attend, the assistant director attends the meeting.
Andrew Slater (231-591-5968, [email protected])
The Director of Counseling receives information from the CARE team to inform services delivered in the Personal Counseling Center and to ensure collaborative communication. Additionally, the director consults on issues of mental health, crisis, students in emotional distress and disruptive/dangerous behavior. The Director of Counseling keeps privileged mental health treatment records in the counseling center’s electronic recordkeeping system. These records are protected by state and federal health information privacy laws, and information and information is only shared with the CARE team under certain circumstances where confidentiality is superseded by ethical and legal requirements to report information. These circumstances include suspected: child abuse, suspected abuse of a vulnerable adult, and when there are significant clinical concerns for the safety of the individual or safety of others. Disclosure of this information will be made ad narrowly as possible. Referred students can also sign a release of information giving the director permission to share pertinent information. The Director of Counseling attends the meetings and sends a licensed counselor if unable to attend.
Lisa Ortiz (231-591-3759, [email protected])
The Director of Housing and Residential life offers insight into residential life students, after-hours emergencies, and targeted interventions using Resident Advisors (RAs) and Hall Directors (HDs). If the director is unable to attend a meeting, the assistant director should attend. Reports or other useful information should be sent to the chair of the CARE team.
Lina Blair (231-591-2686, [email protected])
The Dean of Student Life attends all meetings. The Dean consults with the Associate Dean on initial ratings with the NABITA Risk Rubric, makes contact with parents when there’s a critical risk to health and safety, and communicates with executive leadership. The Associate Dean of Student Life serves as the backup.
Inner Circle members should attend every meeting, but when they cannot attend, they do not have a trained backup to attend in their place. Inner circle members represent departments that have frequent contact with students, are likely to be involved in either case updates or interventions for the majority of Care cases and can provide valuable insights to the team. Inner circle members have access to the Maxient, the electronic recordkeeping database for Care Team cases.
Steve Reifert (231-591-2300, [email protected])
The Associate Provost often serves as the primary contact in working with faculty, department chairs, provosts, and academic advisors. The academic representative also provides information related to the referred student’s academic history and performance as well as insight into the academic experience. If this person is unable to attend a meeting, reports or other useful information should be sent to the CARE team chair.
Cindy Smith (231-591-3058, [email protected])
The representative from DARC consults and offers guidance on issues of academic, residential, and other accommodations. If the representative is unable to attend a meeting, reports or other useful information should be sent to the chair of the CARE team. Records in DARC are protected under FERPA and exist in the disability services electronic record system.
Jessica Ettell Irvine ([email protected])
The Title IX Coordinator attends when there is a Title IX matter that overlaps in a way that’s useful for both the Title IX coordinator and the Care Team to discuss. Records for Title IX are maintained separately from the Care Team records. Information sharing depends on the circumstances and status of the Title IX case and the coordinator should use discretion in sharing information. The Care Team can assist in assessing risk and in intervention at the direction of the Title IX Coordinator.
Anthony Norman (231-591-4490, [email protected])
The Assistant General Counsel attends meetings when an issue presents a legal concern for which the General Counsel’s expertise is essential. The representative who attends should maintain a consultative role and support the mission and polices of the CARE team.
Outer circle members serve the Care team in a consultant capacity. They are invited in for cases that relate to their specific content areas and do not attend meetings regularly. To facilitate awareness of Care team cases and prompt their attendance at the meeting, outer circle members are sent the agenda in advance of the meeting so that they can check the list of names for students that have overlap with their respective departments. They do not have access to the team’s the electronic database but are a common source of referrals to the team given their interactions with students in their departments.
Emergencies and acts of violence should immediately be reported to the Ferris State University Department of Public Safety at x5000/231-591-5000/911. Faculty and staff working in off-campus locations (i.e., Kendall College of Arts and Design and Statewide Locations) should report emergencies to local law enforcement/911.
Reports to the Care Team should be made in a timely manner on Navigate or CLICKING HERE.
Instructions for submitting a referral on Navigate:
If the reporter does not know the identity of the student OR if they are not a Ferris Faculty or Staff member, please fill out the online reporting form.
Faculty, staff and others may refer any student demonstrating behaviors of concern to any member of the Care Team. The Care Team is also available for consultation to determine who and how is best to respond given all the information available.
The Care TEAM regularly meets on Tuesdays at 3pm during the fall and spring semesters to address new student behavioral concerns and to provide updates regarding previously reported concerns. Reports to the Care Team should be made promptly and will likely be reviewed within 24 hours of submission. An initial information gathering effort and assessment on the NABITA Risk Rubric will be made and recorded with the case in Maxient. If a report is received and is an immediate concern, the Care TEAM will be called together outside of the regular meeting time. 0
Referrals from the weekend should be submitted by Monday mornings at noon. The agenda for Tuesday afternoon Care meetings will be created and sent to Care Team members on Monday afternoon. It is expected that Care Team members review the cases on the agenda and gather related information in preparation for Tuesday’s Care Team meeting.
Additional community members may be consulted and sit on the Care TEAM meetings as needed to assist with specific behavioral concerns for which their knowledge of the situation and/or expertise is relevant.
Regular team meetings include discussion about prior cases and new cases. For each case, the team will engage in a three-phase process of information gathering, risk rubric analysis and intervention. Members are expected to share information gathered from their respective areas, engage actively and collaboratively in the risk rubric analysis and collectively determine the need for new or continued intervention or case monitoring/closure.
It is a goal of the Care Team to minimize/avoid canceling meetings whenever possible. On weeks there are fewer cases to discuss, the team will dedicate time to ongoing training.
Because there is no single or combined set of indicators that will always reliably predict an individual’s future behavior, the CARE TEAM does take into consideration odd, suspicious and/or inappropriate behavior that rises beyond a typical classroom or employee management concern. These behaviors of concern may be observed in a variety of mediums including their speech, written words, and/or their actions. Concerns may include:
While there is no single set of behaviors that will reliably predict an individual’s future behavior or risk of harming others, the threat assessment process gathers and evaluates information available including behavioral evidence to make an objective determination of the likelihood and degree of risk of harm to a person’s self or to the campus community. Assessment is designed to distinguish whether there is a threat and the degree of threat for every case reported. Accurate and objective risk assessment helps guide interventions and helps ensure the safety of the individual of concern and all others potentially involved as well as to resolve the conditions that initiated the concerning behavior.
Assessment assists in early identification of situations that may pose a threat to others, creates a baseline of information against which to assess future behavior, and provides a means for implementing interventions to increase the likelihood of a positive and safe resolution.
1. Once a report has been received by the Care Team, the chair or their backup will perform an initial assessment on the student’s level of risk, often using the NABITA Risk Rubric, and whether or not there is an immediate risk/reason for concern. If the initial assessment indicates there is an elevated risk (3 on the NaBITA Risk Rubric) or higher, the team will call a meeting to inform and/or manage the situation as soon as possible. If not, the case will be reviewed at the next regularly scheduled Care TEAM meeting. The chair of the Care Team will prioritize cases on the agenda, covering elevated and critical cases first. During the Care Team meeting, the team will apply the NABITA Risk Rubric to every case discussed by the team. Using the information gathered as part of the preliminary assessment and during the data gathering phase of the team meeting, the team will come to a consensus on the current level of risk for the case. Risk level will be reassessed each time the case is discussed at the team meeting and at the time of case closure.
2. The assessment process may include, but is not limited to, any of the following data gathering processes:
To assist in assessing the level of risk a student may pose, the Care TEAM may utilize the NaBITA Risk Rubric or some other appropriate model. Below is a summary of various risk levels and how the University may respond to those risks:
Mild risk (1)
The individual here may be struggling and not doing well. The impact of their difficulty is limited around others, with the occasional report being made to the Care Team out of an abundance of caution and concern rather than any direct behavior or threats. They may be having trouble fitting in, adjusting to college, making friends, or may rub people the wrong way. They alienate others with their thoughts or mannerisms, and there may be minor bullying and conflict. With support and resources, it is likely the individual will be successful adapting and overcoming obstacles. Without support, it is possible they will continue to escalate on the rubric.
Moderate risk (2)
Prior to this stage, conflict with others has been fairly limited. The hallmark of moderate is an increase in conflict with others through aggressive speech, actions, and mannerisms. They may become frustrated and engage in non-verbal behaviors or begin to post things on social media, put up posters around campus, or storm away from conversations. Stress, illness, lack of friends, and support are now becoming an increasing concern. The individual may be tearful, sad, hopeless, anxious, or frustrated. This may be caused by difficulty adjusting, dating stress, failure in class assignments, and/or increasing social isolation. If there is a threat or physical violence such as carelessly pushing someone out of their way while storming off, the violence is typically limited and driven by adrenaline and impulsiveness, rather than any deeper plan to hurt others.
Elevated risk (3)
Behavior at the elevated stage is increasingly disruptive (with multiple incidents)
and involves multiple offices such as student conduct, law enforcement, and counseling.
The individual may engage in suicidal talk, self-injury, substance intoxication. Threats
of violence and ultimatums may be vague but direct or specific but indirect. A fixation
and focus on a target often emerge (person, place, or system) and
the individual continues to attack the target’s self-esteem, public image, and/or
access to safety and support. Others may feel threatened around this individual, but
any threat lacks depth, follow-through, or a narrowing against an individual, office,
or community. More serious social, mental health, academic, and adjustment concerns
occur, and the individual is in need of more timely support and resources to avoid
further escalation. Conditional ultimatums such as “do this or else” may be made to
instructors, peers, faculty, and staff.
Critical risk (4)
In this stage, there is a serious risk of suicide, life-threatening self-injury, dangerous risk taking (e.g. driving a motorcycle at top speed at night with the lights off) and/or inability to care for oneself. They may display racing thoughts, high risk substance dependence, intense anger, and/or perceived unfair treatment or grievance that has a major impact on the students’ academic, social, and peer interactions. The individual has clear target for their threats and ultimatums, access to lethal means, and an attack plan to punish those they see as responsible for perceived wrongs. Without immediate intervention (such as law enforcement or psychiatric hospitalization), it is likely violence will occur. There may be leakage about the attack plan (social media posts that say “I’m going to be the next school shooter” or telling a friend to avoid coming to campus on a particular day). There may be stalking behavior and escalating predatory actions prior to violence such as intimidation, telegraphing, and “test-runs” such as causing a disruption to better understand reaction time of emergency response.
Based on the behavior displayed, information gathered and the assessment by the Care Team, the team may make any of the following recommendations for intervention. Recommendations may be made in consultation with the appropriate college, department, or administrator before any final action is taken. Below is a list of some of the intervention strategies that the University may use. Recommendations may differ based on the unique facets of each student’s situation and the assessed level of threat.