Responding to and/or evaluating student writing need not take a great deal of your
time.
Provide most of your feedback informally as students plan and write, then evaluate
the final product quickly.
Having conferences with students saves you time and can increase clarity, as they
can ask you questions. You can hold quick in-class conferences while students work
individually or in groups.
Build in other readers before you. Have students receive feedback from their peers;
recommend or require that they attend the Writing Center.
Not all writing has to be long. Rather than assigning one very long paper, assign
several short ones or have them write a series of drafts, of which you read only one.
Rather than only requiring "formal" writing, have them do more informal writing which
may be used in class, or collected at random.
Don't read everything you have your students write. Collect, read and grade their
writing randomly.
Prioritize. Decide what is most important to you in each assignment (Format? Clarity? Demonstration
of knowledge? Audience awareness? Spelling?) and evaluate based on your top priorities.
Don't evaluate or comment on everything in a paper; focus your evaluation on two or
three aspects that are most important to you (and that you identified as being most
important in making the assignment).
Don't correct students' errors for them. Point out the most significant shortcomings
in the paper (based on your priorities) briefly, then require that they make the corrections.