Relevant Literature

• Stuart SA, Brown MI, Draper SW. Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: One practitioner's application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2004; 20:95-102. http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/ilig/papers/stuartbrown.pdf

• Nicol DJ, Boyle JT. Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education. 2003; 28:457-473. http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~ctalk/bulletin/glasgow1.pdf

• Stein, PS, Challman SD, Brueckner JK. Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course. Journal of Nursing Education. 2006;45:469-473.

• Reay NW, Bao L, Li P, Warnakulosooriya R, Baugh G. Toward the effective use of voting machines in physics lectures. American Journal of Physics. 2005;73:554-558. http://www.votingmachine.net/publications/VM_article_jun06.pdf

• Uhari M, Renko M, Soini H. Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMS Medical Education. 2003;3:1-6. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6920-3-12.pdf

• Sharma MD, Khachan J, Chan B, O'Byrne J. An investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lecture classes. Australasian Journal of Technical Education. 2005;21:137-54. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/sharma.html

• Miller RG, Ashar BH, Getz KJ. Evaluation of an audience response system for continuing education of health professionals. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2003;23:109-115.

• Schackow TE, Chavex M, Loya L. Friedman M. Audience response system: Effect on learning in family medical residents. Family Medicine. 2004;36:496-504. http://www.stfm.org/fmhub/fm2004/July/T.496.pdf

• Latessa R, Mouw D. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Family Medicine. 2005;37:12-14. http://www.stfm.org/fmhub/fm2005/january/robyn12.pdf

• Copeland HL, Hewson HG, Stoller JK, Longworth DL. Making the continuing medical education lecture effective. Journal of Continuing Education for the Health Professions. 1998;18:227-34.

• Pradhan A, Saparano D, Anath C. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: An application to resident education. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;193:1827-30.

• Slain D, Abate M, Hodges BM, et.al. An interactive response system to promote active learning in the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmacy Education. 2004;68:1-9. http://www.ajpe.org/doi/pdf/10.5688/aj6805117

• Paschal CB. Formative assessment in physiology teaching using a wireless classroom communication system. Advances in Physiology Education. 2002;26:299-308. http://advan.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/26/4/299

• Preszler RW, Dawe A, Shuster CB, Shuster M. Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. Life Sciences Education. 2007;6:29-41. http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/reprint/6/1/29.pdf